Decision Risk Score0–100
A weighted composite of four signals — regret, wellbeing, trajectory and financial — normalised against the matched cohort and banded as watch, elevated, or critical. It scores the decision context, never the client as a person.
Matched casesReviewed signals
The reviewed decision signals that passed a five-gate filter — domain, subtype, age band, locale and pattern hint — to form this report's cohort. The matched-case count tells you how much evidence sits behind the read.
ConfidenceGrade
How firmly the pattern is attested — composed from sample sufficiency, pattern coherence, locale fit and outcome resolution. Higher confidence means a more stable read, not a stronger prediction.
Risk componentsWeighted
The four signals behind the score, each shown with its weight, so you can see which driver to address first. The component read tells you where to sequence the work — not what the client should do.
Trajectory forkObserved paths
Three paths observed in the matched cohort, each with a share and a regret marker. Used to choose the coaching intervention — explicitly not to forecast which path this client will take.
Question bankStaged
Questions sequenced by stage of the work, designed to be used sparingly — one well-placed question outperforms three. The report names an anchor question to open the conversation.
Evidence boundariesKnown limits
The stated limits of the read. The vault intentionally over-samples adverse outcomes, so path shares are directional pattern weights — not population base rates — and small cohorts are directional only.